The value of bitcoin has fallen sharply since reaching record heights last month, above $126,000 at the start of October. (Photo by Justin TALLIS / AFP via Getty Images)
AFP via Getty Images
When Bitcoin fell nearly 24% in November, from all-time highs above $126,000 to lows near $80,500, headlines focused on ETF outflows, shifting Fed signals, and the return of macro-driven volatility. But beneath the price action, a different story unfolded: the quiet resilience, and in some cases, advancement of Bitcoin’s foundational financial infrastructure.
While retail narratives centered on short-term losses, institutional allocators and ecosystem architects were observing something more structural. Three distinct approaches to unlocking Bitcoin’s productivity – centralized bridging, decentralized bridging, and native programmability – each reacted differently to the stress. And in those reactions, they revealed not only their current viability, but the paths institutions may follow as Bitcoin shifts from store-of-value to capital-efficient asset class.
The Silent Shift: From Price Action to Productivity
With over $2.1 trillion in total market value, Bitcoin remains the world’s largest digital asset. Yet only 0.1% of that capital is currently deployed into DeFi,according to research firm Mintlayer. For institutions managing large BTC holdings, the question isn’t whether to own Bitcoin, it’s whether that Bitcoin can do more.
Three architectural paths have emerged to address that question:
Centralized bridging, where assets like WBTC are issued through custodians and integrated into existing DeFi systemsDecentralized bridging, exemplified by protocols like tBTC, which uses cryptographic threshold networks to eliminate single points of custodyNative smart contract execution, as proposed by OP_NET, which aims to bring programmability directly to Bitcoin Layer 1
Each model made different trade-offs. And in November’s turbulence, those differences became visible.
tBTC: A Decentralized Alternative Matures
Among the most closely watched infrastructure moves came from Threshold Network, which runs tBTC. In mid-November, the protocol launched a gasless, single-transaction minting feature designed to simplify onboarding across six chains, targeting the very friction points that have historically deterred institutional users.
Despite the broader sell-off, tBTC’s total value locked remained stable in BTC terms, with usage continuing to expand. According to a statement from the protocol’s team, more than $50 million in tBTC was deposited into delta-neutral yield vaults like Yield Basis during the correction, a sign that some institutions saw volatility not as a red flag, but as an entry point.
“Institutions are using this moment to optimize their BTC exposure,” said Threshold co-founder MacLane Wilkison. Many are seeking exposure to yield while maintaining Bitcoin denomination, particularly in environments where traditional yield options have compressed. The new upgrade also enabled cross-chain movement with far less friction, allowing institutions to move between ecosystems to capture better rates or liquidity, MacLane stated.
tBTC’s model, based on decentralized custody via threshold cryptography, also offers a path to self-custody. A new feature, set to launch in the coming months, would allow institutional participants to hold BTC backing their tBTC without commingling funds, a notable differentiator in a compliance-sensitive environment.
OP_NET: The Case for Native Programmability
While bridges debate custody models, OP_NET is taking a more foundational approach in bringing full programmability to Bitcoin Layer 1 without bridges or wrapped assets. Its founders argue that Bitcoin DeFi shouldn’t require leaving Bitcoin’s trust model in the first place.
The protocol’s testnet has already seen over 1.7 million interactions, with 176 contracts deployed using a custom WebAssembly environment. Unlike most smart contract systems, OP_NET uses BTC as gas, and processes transactions natively through Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus.
The system was architected to handle volatility. Its consensus model, which scales throughput linearly as more nodes join, showed stability under simulated stress, including congestion, latency spikes, and fee volatility. “We designed scalability from security,” said co-founder Samuel Patt. “Instead of outsourcing security to bridges or L2s, we extended Bitcoin’s native functionality to support computation directly.”
OP_NET also takes a position on token economics that diverges from prevailing DeFi norms: it has no native token. The goal is to make BTC productive on its own terms, with fees flowing back to miners and no new asset layers introduced. That decision reflects growing institutional skepticism toward token-based incentives that often decouple from network utility.
Context: WBTC Still Dominates in Liquidity
While new infrastructure gains momentum, Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) still…